Senior Associate

Christopher DeMatteo

  • Bar Admissions

    • Connecticut
    • Wisconsin
    • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    • U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Christopher DeMatteo is a distinguished attorney who represents clients in New Haven, Bridgeport, Hartford and other Connecticut courts. Recognized by his peers for his exceptional legal skills, Chris was selected to Super Lawyers from 2019 through 2024. This prestigious selection is based on an evaluation of 12 indicators, including peer recognition and professional achievement in legal practice, highlighting his outstanding contributions to the field.


Hailing from New Haven, Chris went to Boston College, where he majored in history, and earned his juris doctor at Marquette Law School in Milwaukee in 2010. He returned home, passed the bar and was admitted to practice in Connecticut that same year. After working for a personal injury firm for two years, he opened and ran his own solo law practice for nearly ten years, focusing on criminal defense, child protection (DCF) and civil litigation. He joined Atty. Pattis’s firm in 2022. 


In his career, Chris has tried more than forty cases and argued more than ten appeals. He has also obtained favorable settlements for clients in civil lawsuits and helped reunite numerous families who were subject to DCF proceedings. 


Chris is active in the Connecticut Bar Association and is currently the vice-chair of its Criminal Law Section. He has planned and presented Continuing Legal Education (CLE) programs on ethics, criminal law and legal entrepreneurship. 


A free speech advocate and civil libertarian, Chris has written opinion pieces on legal topics for local newspapers and websites. When he is not working or writing, Chris likes to play softball, cook and learn trivia. He lives with his wife and daughter in Fairfield County.


Notable Results

State v. L.G.: across the board not guilty verdict on charges of Inciting Injury (C felonies) in Meriden.

Tichenor v. Warden: habeas petition granted on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel.

In re Domonic S. / Rylee S.: denial of termination of parental rights (TPR) petitions following a trial in juvenile court. Chris’s client, a father, was subsequently reunited with his two children.

In re Immanuel R.: dismissal of neglect petition and order of temporary custody. Chris’s client, a mother, was reunited with her son after they won the trial. 

Michel v. City of Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024): reversal of a trial court decision in an employee free speech case, which further defined Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-51q. 

Lafferty v. Jones, 225 Conn. App. 552 (2024): vacatur of an attorney’s disciplinary suspension by a trial court following a writ of error granted by the Appellate Court. 

Danielle D. v. DCF, reversal of a DCF substantiation and registry placement concerning the unexplained injuries to an infant child. 


Publications

Challenging Books Also Challenges Democracy

The Thinning Wall Between Church and State

Our attorneys have been featured by:


Featured Videos

Norm Pattis discusses a significant case with the press.

Norm Pattis shares his insights on America's justice system.

IN the news

Appellate Victory for Pattis & Paz: New Trial Ordered for Client
January 26, 2026
The Connecticut Supreme Court has reversed a prior appellate decision and granted a new trial to Cecil Grant, a client represented on appeal by Attorney Norm Pattis of Pattis & Paz, LLC.
blind justice
December 22, 2025
Our office recently secured a successful ruling on a suppression motion in the Judicial District of Bridgeport. The case centered on an unconstitutional search and seizure during an investigative stop by the Bridgeport Police Task Force.
Derby Superior Courthouse
December 22, 2025
Javon Coverson is represented by New Haven attorney Brittany Paz; Due in Court March 26th
Kosta Diamantis enters the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport during a break in his trial
December 22, 2025
A federal judge denied a request from Konstantinos Diamantis, the former director of Connecticut’s school construction program, to question the 12 jurors who convicted him of bribery, extortion, conspiracy and lying to federal investigators earlier this year.
Attorney Brittany Paz with Client
November 14, 2025
Full dismissal for a client facing serious charges, including robbery and a shooting. Our client walked away with no convictions.
Norm  Pattis press photo
October 16, 2025
Diamantis’ defense attorney, Norm Pattis, has portrayed his client as an aggressive, hands-on manager rather than a corrupt state official.
Hands exchanging money under a table, suggesting a bribe.
August 20, 2025
Defense attorney Norm Pattis represents Kosta Diamantis in a federal bribery trial tied to Gov. Lamont’s administration.
Ex-CT cop who served 2½ years for sexual assault before court's reversal gets 'unconditional release
June 12, 2025
TORRINGTON — A former Middletown police officer who was sentenced to six years in prison in 2019 — and served roughly two and a half years — for the sexual assault of a 15-year-old girl at a Litchfield residential treatment center was given an unconditional release Thursday at state Superior Court in Torrington.
How Reliable Is DNA Evidence? A Criminal Defense Attorney Breaks It Down
May 13, 2025
When it comes to criminal cases, DNA evidence is often portrayed as a silver bullet. But is it really that conclusive? In this post, Attorney Brittany Paz explores the complex realities of DNA testing, the reliability of forensic reports, and the critical role of Porter hearings in Connecticut courts. Here are the top insights from her latest video on what every defense attorney—and client—should know.
Waterbury Woman Accused of Holding Stepson Captive Wants GPS Monitor Removed
April 9, 2025
WATERBURY — The 57-year-old woman accused of holding her stepson captive for more than two decades asked the state's appellate court on Monday to reverse a Superior Court judge's order requiring her to wear a GPS monitor, arguing the decision was legally improper and not supported by evidence.
More Blogs